Kit Cars In EA Sports WRC: Late 90s Giant-toppling Tarmac Rockets

EA Sports WRC Citroen Xsara Kit Car Bugalski.jpg
Image: EA Sports
Rally1 cars are usually comfortably faster than those of the lower classes – both in the real WRC and in EA Sports WRC. However, there used to be a class that managed to topple the giants from time to time – Kit Cars.

The late 1990s were an interesting, exciting time for motorsport. Sportscar racing saw diverse grids at Le Mans, Michael Schumacher and Mika Häkkinen battled for the World Championship in F1, and in WRC, iconic drivers like Tommi Mäkinen, Richard Burns, Carlos Sainz (Senior, not his smoothly operating son) or Colin McRae blasted over all sorts of surfaces, often sideways. You know, usual rally stuff.

Since 1997, they used vehicles built to World Rally Car regulations instead of the Group A set of rules that had shaped the de-facto top class from 1987 until 1996. There was one exception among the manufacturers, namely Mitsubishi, who still fielded Group A-spec Lancers, which did not get into Mäkinens way en route to four successive titles between 1996 and 1999.


2 Litres of Glory​

Below the WRC cars, however, there was the FIA 2-Litre World Rally Cup, as it was officially called. Having contested its inaugural season in 1993, the series’ bread and butter were front-wheel driven, naturally-aspriated cars. Manufacturers like Seat, Skoda, Peugeot and later Renault and Citroen all competed.

So far, so ordinary. But what was less ordinary were that these Kit Cars – which derived their names from sets of certain homologated parts – occasionally rose up and flat-out beat the top-class WRC cars as the 1990s concluded.

Signs of this appeared in 1997 when Gilles Panizzi managed to score a third place in that year’s Rally Catalunya – outright, not in class. And then, the Frenchman only went and did it again at the next event, the Tour de Corse, with his teammate Francois Delecour following suit in fourth place.

Both events were held on tarmac, which apparently complemented the Kit Cars. But even the 2-Litre World Rally Cup was held on other surfaces, including gravel, of course, so you could not exactly go ahead and put all your eggs in the non-loose surface basket, right?

Peugeot 306 Maxi Kit Car.jpg

Peugeot 306 Maxi. Image: Jorjum on Wikimedia Commons, available for redistribution via the CC-BY SA 3.0 deed

Peugeot & Citroen Go All In​

Well, either no one told Peugeot and Citroen that, or they simply did not care. Because that is exactly what they did, despite that making them sitting ducks at gravel events. The result was closer to a touring car than a rally vehicle, as the Peugeot 306 Maxi and Citroen Xsara looked a lot more like circuit racing cars than sidways-going gravel rockets.

And that was an undeniable advantage on tarmac stages, which Citroen and Philippe Bugalski demonstrated in 1999. Instead of just getting close to an overall victory, the Frenchman and his co-driver Jean-Paul Chiaroni only went on to plonk their Xsara Kit Car in first place overall at Rally Catalunya. And then they did it again next time out in France at the Tour de Corse.

Of course, this injustice towards the top-class WRC cars could not stand in the eyes of the FIA. The result: new regulations from 2000 onwards, with the JWRC running Super 1600-spec cars and the Production World Rally Championship (PWRC) using Super 2000 specfications to replace the 2-Litre World Rally Cup. Boo.

Luckily, the spectacular tarmac weapons live on in EA Sports WRC. With the recent release of the Le Maestros DLC pack, the Citroen Xsara Kit Car joined the F2 Kit Cars roster, increasing the car count of that class to seven.

F2 Kit Cars In EA Sports WRC​

  • Citroen Xsara Kit Car
  • Ford Escort Mk 6 Maxi
  • Peugeot 306 Maxi
  • Renault Maxi Mégane
  • Seat Ibiza Kit Car
  • Vauxhall Astra Rally Kit Car
  • Volkswagen Golf IV Kit Car

Strapping into one of these wide-arched rally rockets is great fun and rather intense indeed – particularly on tarmac, of course. Tackling the busy stages of Rally Mediterraneo (so essentially Tour de Corse) in them results in rather frantic runs, but once you finally get a chance to catch your breath after stopping once you crossed the finish line, it will feel like a proper achievement to have kept it clean.

Just don’t expect to be all that competitive against WRC cars on anything but tarmac.

What is your opinion on Kit Cars in rallying and EA Sports WRC? Let us know in the comments below!
About author
Yannik Haustein
Lifelong motorsport enthusiast and sim racing aficionado, walking racing history encyclopedia.

Sim racing editor, streamer and one half of the SimRacing Buddies podcast (warning, German!).

Heel & Toe Gang 4 life :D

Comments

Kit cars are so beast I think of them as Group B FWD. I get that makes no sense from a literal/historical standpoint but the cars are so peppy and responsive that it makes sense at least to my broken brain. I'm a rwd junke (Expert Historic Club, ftw!) but I enjoy the kit cars too. I liked them even in DR2 but they're amazing in WRC and seem a lot more popular this time around
 
They should add more f2 kit cars. Used to love watching British rally championship on a Saturday morning as a kid. The astra vs the megane and the golf mk4. Then you had the hyundai coupe and ford escort too
 
Club Staff
Premium
The reason why Peugeot and Citroën went all in on tarmac @Yannik Haustein is quite simple. They didn't participate in the F2 World Rally Cup. They had all their focus on the French championship which was a pure asphalt championship. Yes, you had, and still have a French gravel championship, but basically all the different trophies and cups were on asphalt, so it was the place to participate.
And just like in rallycross, where the national championship in France could have more Rallycross Specials (as the Supercars class were known as back then) than the European Championship, there was a solid manufacturer backing in to the national championship.
That way they could fully concentrate on the tarmac spec of the cars.

Of course, up until 1996, the Kit Cars and "Maxis" weren't really a thing. Skoda won the championship in 1994 with the 1.3l Favorit, Peugeot won in 1995, but that was, with the exception of Monte Carlo and Corsica privateers. Even the Skoda Felicia Kit Cars never got larger engines than the 1.6l ones.

SEAT and Skoda were the only manufacturers that really went for the F2 title, Renault made some efforts, but it was largely just SEAT and Skoda that bothered sending actual manufacturer entries out of Europe on regular. Of course, with time, there would be privateers buying the cars, and entering rallies, and by the time 1999 rolled on by, with Peugeot being in the final stages of their 206 WRC effort, and Citroën moving to WRC. SEAT already having done so, it was mainly just Renault left, while Hyundai were racking up experience for their move to the Accent WRC. As for 1999 the manufacturers had to sign up properly for the 2L Cup, and those were the only ones that bothered with it. Or.. VW bothered, but didn't do enough events.

The Kit Cars were still used in France though, and Bugalski became French champion in 2000, and a certain Sebastien Loeb in 2001 with the Xsara Kit Car. Not for an lack of effort though. There were both Kit Cars and later on S1600 cars on overall podiums in the French championship.

The Kit Cars did get slowed down a bit with FIA rules with regards to weight, but the main reason the Kit Cars went out was costs. It initially was a cheaper, easier way to get in to rally than Group A, but as WRC cars became the norm, it wasn't much more expensive to have a WRC-car that would be effective on all surfaces. The F2 rules were so open that it became really expensive. With high tech transmissions, differentials etc. one quote about the Xsara Kit Car is relatively telling. "Traction Control was equipped to the electronically controlled, hydraulic differental gear box". Of course, with Traction Control, 300+HP and 960kg, the car would be extremely effective... and expensive.
 
OverTake
Premium
The reason why Peugeot and Citroën went all in on tarmac @Yannik Haustein is quite simple. They didn't participate in the F2 World Rally Cup. They had all their focus on the French championship which was a pure asphalt championship. Yes, you had, and still have a French gravel championship, but basically all the different trophies and cups were on asphalt, so it was the place to participate.
And just like in rallycross, where the national championship in France could have more Rallycross Specials (as the Supercars class were known as back then) than the European Championship, there was a solid manufacturer backing in to the national championship.
That way they could fully concentrate on the tarmac spec of the cars.

Of course, up until 1996, the Kit Cars and "Maxis" weren't really a thing. Skoda won the championship in 1994 with the 1.3l Favorit, Peugeot won in 1995, but that was, with the exception of Monte Carlo and Corsica privateers. Even the Skoda Felicia Kit Cars never got larger engines than the 1.6l ones.

SEAT and Skoda were the only manufacturers that really went for the F2 title, Renault made some efforts, but it was largely just SEAT and Skoda that bothered sending actual manufacturer entries out of Europe on regular. Of course, with time, there would be privateers buying the cars, and entering rallies, and by the time 1999 rolled on by, with Peugeot being in the final stages of their 206 WRC effort, and Citroën moving to WRC. SEAT already having done so, it was mainly just Renault left, while Hyundai were racking up experience for their move to the Accent WRC. As for 1999 the manufacturers had to sign up properly for the 2L Cup, and those were the only ones that bothered with it. Or.. VW bothered, but didn't do enough events.

The Kit Cars were still used in France though, and Bugalski became French champion in 2000, and a certain Sebastien Loeb in 2001 with the Xsara Kit Car. Not for an lack of effort though. There were both Kit Cars and later on S1600 cars on overall podiums in the French championship.

The Kit Cars did get slowed down a bit with FIA rules with regards to weight, but the main reason the Kit Cars went out was costs. It initially was a cheaper, easier way to get in to rally than Group A, but as WRC cars became the norm, it wasn't much more expensive to have a WRC-car that would be effective on all surfaces. The F2 rules were so open that it became really expensive. With high tech transmissions, differentials etc. one quote about the Xsara Kit Car is relatively telling. "Traction Control was equipped to the electronically controlled, hydraulic differental gear box". Of course, with Traction Control, 300+HP and 960kg, the car would be extremely effective... and expensive.
That's great input - thank you for sharing that, Ole, much appreciated!
 
Back in the day, tarmac rallies had bigger part in WRC/F2 Cup. Nowadays most rallies are gravel, because it’s cheaper and looks better on photos. Shame really
 
I mostly only like the gravel rallies in the game but have fun wrestling kit cars up a hill and round a turn on gravel. The only tarmac rally I've really enjoyed thus far is Central Europe, maybe because there's more room to play with but that one is all the more fun - stomach-turning fast sections and a sense of moving across a landscape. Maybe I'll take a kit car there next.
 
This game seems more and more interesting. Have the optimisation and the shaders loading ingame been improved? Or are just users now used to the bad optimisation and have already race on each track so shaders have been all calculated?
 
OverTake
Premium
This game seems more and more interesting. Have the optimisation and the shaders loading ingame been improved? Or are just users now used to the bad optimisation and have already race on each track so shaders have been all calculated?
It's a bit difficult to say for sure because it tends to vary a lot on different setups. In my experience, it has gotten better indeed, with my FPS often hitting 150+ where it would sometimes struggle to stay at a stable 90 a while ago. In places it can look really nice, but the overall look hasn't really changed.
 
It's a bit difficult to say for sure because it tends to vary a lot on different setups. In my experience, it has gotten better indeed, with my FPS often hitting 150+ where it would sometimes struggle to stay at a stable 90 a while ago. In places it can look really nice, but the overall look hasn't really changed.
So optimisation is fine. What still worries me is the shaders compilation. If it's still processed while racing on a stage for the first time or after having changed the graphics settings. I assume that, id it was still a big issue many would have complain again with the DLCs' new stages.
 

Article information

Author
Yannik Haustein
Article read time
3 min read
Views
3,109
Comments
9
Last update

With WRC leaving EA/Codemasters :Who will be blessed with the new WRC license?

  • Sabre

    Votes: 13 1.9%
  • KT Racing

    Votes: 61 8.8%
  • Milestone

    Votes: 87 12.5%
  • The Last Garage

    Votes: 11 1.6%
  • BeamNG

    Votes: 135 19.4%
  • iRacing

    Votes: 107 15.4%
  • Straight4 Studios

    Votes: 8 1.1%
  • Bugbear Entertainment

    Votes: 25 3.6%
  • Motorsport Games / Studio 397

    Votes: 61 8.8%
  • Kunos Simulazioni

    Votes: 98 14.1%
  • Reiza Studios

    Votes: 67 9.6%
  • Other (add in the comments below)

    Votes: 23 3.3%
Back
Top